Properly sizing UV Sterilizers

mojo

Active Member
Market
Messages
2,201
Reaction score
2
I've posted this in bits and pieces several times, but it's a topic that comes up a lot, so I thought I'd do a proper writeup that can be referenced later.

Take the time to size a UV properly, or your money will be wasted.

UV sterilizers can be useful, but only if sized correctly. You can't put a 9w sterilizer on a 100g tank and expect it to be useful to kill off Ich. So how do you know what size UV sterilizer it'd take?

Basics

Ich (or any other microorganism) is killed by UV because the UV breaks down the cell wall and then the DNA within the cells. This is exactly the same process that you get a sunburn - exposure to UV. And in exactly the same way, you sunburn only when the duration and intensity is long enough - running out to the mailbox isn't enough, but lying on the beach in the middle of summer on a clear day for 6 hours would fry most of us to a crisp. Likewise, Ich has to be exposed to a certain amount of UV before it's killed.

UV Radiation

Intensity is measured in micro-watts of energy per second over a certain area (square centimeter): uWs/cm2 (http://enaqua.com/enweb/enlight/technology/what-is-uv.pdf">ref</a>). Marine Ich is in the genus Ichthyophthirus</em>, and the tomites are the free-swimming stage of the Ich organism and the one that's susceptible to UV sterilization (http://www.peteducation.com/article.cfm?c=16+2160&aid=2421">ref</a>). Using the chart below, we see that the amount of radiation to kill Ich in this stage is 336,000 uWs/cm2 - one of the highest on the chart.

So... 336,000 uWs/cm2 will be our target- if we can kill Ich, we can kill algae or anything else that comes through the UV.


UV Sterilizer Ratings

Now we'd need to put this in practice. Any decent UV sterilizer manufacturer should publish the exposure rate for their product, ideally in saltwater. Some manufacturers even publish the rate at different flow rates, which is most accurate. For example, see page two of http://www.aquaultraviolet.com/sites/default/files/brochures/UV Charts Salt and Fresh Water.pdf">Aqua UV's manual</a>.

I would highly recommend NOT buying a UV sterilizer from a company that does not publish this number. This would be the same as buying a pump without knowing the gph ratings...

Putting it all together

So now it's time to do a little math. Let's choose the Aqua UV 80 watt sterilizer. Based on that chart, it's rated for 90,000 uW/cm2 @ 1226gph. Note that the radiation goes down when the flow goes up- this makes sense, since the water is going through faster and simply doesn't get exposed to as much radiation.

If you do the math, you'll see that it's linear - if you push the water through twice as fast, you'll get about half as much radiation. (Again, if you're on the beach for 3 hours instead of 6 hours, you get half as much UV radiation, and you're not quite as lobster-ish at the end of the day.)

So... we can divide it out. To get 336,000 uWs/cm2 from 90,000 uWs/cm2, we'd need to slow down the water by (336 / 90) = 4. So take that 1226gph rating, divide it by 4, and we get 306gph for that sterilizer</em>. It'd be nice if the manufacturers created another column to show this, but the math will get us there....

Sizing for your tank

So, now we have our gph rating for the sterilizer. But is this enough? If you have a 100g system, is 50gph through the UV enough? What kind of flow through the UV sterilizer should we have for a certain size system?

This part gets a little fuzzy, and I haven't been able to find concrete numbers. I tend to recommend the 1x turnover rule - if you have a 100g system, then find a UV sterilizer that you can run at 100gph to reach the 336,000 uWs/cm2 target.

If someone can find some quantifiable numbers for this, then speak up, but I don't believe any research has been done. Anything less than the system volume once per hour seems too low; anything higher gets overly expensive.

Conclusion

<ul>
<li>Not all sterilizers are rated the same. You must look at the radiation produced by a given sterilizer. To get the 336,000 target on http://www.marinedepot.com/Coralife_Turbo_Twist_12X_36_Watt_U.V._Sterilizer_Up_To_500_Gallons_36_to_40_Watt_UV_Sterilizers-Coralife-ES77070-FIUVUUTO-ES77072-vi.html">Coralife\'s 36watt sterilizer</a> brings us to 2.8 gph; to do the same on a [IMG]http://www.marinedepot.com/Aqua_UV_57_Watt_2_inch_w_Wiper_UV_Sterilizer_57_Watt_UV_Sterilizers-Aqua_Ultraviolet-AV2111-FIUVUUFS-AV2283-vi.html">40w Aqua UV</a> requires 241 gph (no - those are not mistypes!).</li>
<li>[I]Effective</em> UV sterilization is not cheap. Sorry - there\'s no free lunch. Yes, you may be able to kill algae or something else in the water column, but you won\'t be killing Ich unless you reach the correct radiation.</li>
<li>Be aware that companies tend to over-estimate their products. They\'re in the business to sell their product, not to kill your Ich. If they give a uWs/cm2 rating with a gph range, for example, rest assured that you need to use the most pessimistic numbers published. If they don\'t give a uWs/cm2 rating, then don\'t buy from them.</li>
<li>Which company is best? I personally don\'t think that one is better than another - they all work on the same concept. Some are built better or have nicer features, but they all work on the same basic concept. Buy whatever fits into your budget and has the features you want.</li>
<li>Based on the above, someone could come up with a chart that would show the units appropriate for a given tank size. It\'d take some work, but it\'s doable.</li>
</ul>

[B]Exposure Chart[/B]

[IMG]http://www.aquaticeco.com/images/static/techtalk/UV_exposures.gif" alt="" />[/I][/I]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As a quick followup, I'll provide a chart for Aqua UV, mostly because the chart is still in front of me and that's what I run, so I'm curious:

This chart is ONLY for Aqua UV!!!

0-50 gallon system: Classic 8
50-100g system: Classic 25
100g-200g: Classic 40
-250g: Classic 57
-300g: Classic 80 or 114
-400g: Classic 160
-500g: Classic 240

The sterilizers should be run at or below 1x the system volume. So for a 150g system, you'd want a Classic 40w, running at 150gph.

a>.
 
Good write up Chris. Does it hurt if you go bigger than needed?
 
Steve;435108 wrote: Good write up Chris. Does it hurt if you go bigger than needed?

I've never read anything that would indicate that it would, and given that my numbers are based on the minimums, I'd say that bigger is better in this case, esp. if you're serious about keeping Ich under control.
 
without a wiper, but the more I read about it, the wiper comes in handy.

http://www.fishtanksdirect.com/browseproducts/40watt-UV-2-inchBy-Aqua-UltravioletFREE-SHIPPING!.html">http://www.fishtanksdirect.com/browseproducts/40watt-UV-2-inchBy-Aqua-UltravioletFREE-SHIPPING!.html</a>

I am going to order one.
 
Mojo. Is Aqua UV the best brand to buy. I'm want to pick up something for a 220 that can kill even ick!! Thanks.
 
Aqua UV just happens to be what I run. I'm happy with it, but I'm not saying it's the best or the worst. Some people swear by the Emperor UV sterilizers - check with Skriz to see what he says.

Otherwise, based on my experience, I'd say you'd be fine with a 57w Aqua UV.
 
mojo;439839 wrote: Aqua UV just happens to be what I run. I'm happy with it, but I'm not saying it's the best or the worst. Some people swear by the Emperor UV sterilizers - check with Skriz to see what he says.

Otherwise, based on my experience, I'd say you'd be fine with a 57w Aqua UV.

I run an Aqua UV as well. Nothing but great service. 57 watt on 260 gallon system
Nice explanation Chris. Thanks for posting the info.
 
excellent info. I have a question. I did use one a few years back, and I haven't had any disease issues in at least 4-5 years (except for the Leopard wrasse intestinal worms which are taking care of), so would u recommend one anyway? I'm on the fence. Also, what about all the pods?

Thanks!
 
Wow, very interesting. Guess I was wasting my time back when I had the Coralife 18w on a MaxiJet 1200!

Dustin
 
Tsunami;439837 wrote: Mojo. Is Aqua UV the best brand to buy. I'm want to pick up something for a 220 that can kill even ick!! Thanks.

IMO, Emperor Aquatics is the best brand.

Their bulbs are effective in a 6" diameter (hence the 6" housing). No other brand that I know of is that powerful.
 
Was going to ask about pods also... I'm of the understanding that any that pass through the UV are toast, correct?
Other than pods and power usage, are there any other things in the negative column about running one?
 
cr500_af;439893 wrote: Was going to ask about pods also... I'm of the understanding that any that pass through the UV are toast, correct?
Other than pods and power usage, are there any other things in the negative column about running one?

Pods should be in the substrate, not in the water column. Whatever pods get suspended and passed through the UV (a properly sized UV) will be toast. This amount will be negligible.

Negatives:

-additional heat source. UV's will add heat to your system. If your system is already too hot, this will only make matters worse.
 
Skriz;439899 wrote: Negatives:

-additional heat source. UV's will add heat to your system. If your system is already too hot, this will only make matters worse.

That should have been obvious to me... not too many cool tanning beds out there. :doh:
 
good information... now, the question...

I would assume that you'd want your final GPM required to kill ICH to MATCH your return pump GPM (in a perfect world)


if it doesn't... how do you handle that?
what are your options? (assuming the GPM needed to kill ICH is much lower than your return GPM)
 
Rbredding;440952 wrote: good information... now, the question...

I would assume that you'd want your final GPM required to kill ICH to MATCH your return pump GPM (in a perfect world)


if it doesn't... how do you handle that?
what are your options? (assuming the GPM needed to kill ICH is much lower than your return GPM)

No, you don't want your return to match the UV. You want to provide the UV what it needs, not provide the aquarium what the uv limits it to.

You can either plumb it accordingly or use a seperate pump.
 
Yeah- what he said - I don't think I'd ever consider running a UV from a return pump, except maybe in a small system. Just use a powerhead to power the UV.
 
Back
Top