Skriz
10-02-2008, 8:57 PM
http://i44.photobucket.com/albums/f27/skriz007/MRC/OF-Brochure-Final-II-web.jpg
|
View Full Version : Ocean Force by MRC Skriz 10-02-2008, 8:57 PM http://i44.photobucket.com/albums/f27/skriz007/MRC/OF-Brochure-Final-II-web.jpg Skriz 10-02-2008, 9:03 PM The new Ocean Force by MRC are now available. Here are some photos of the final release! Aquarium Specialty (http://www.aquariumspecialty.com/catalog/index.php?cPath=34_460)is running a sale on the Ocean Force line right now...go check them out (if you didn't know, they're one of the new ARC sponsors). Derek_S 10-02-2008, 11:03 PM Cool. I like the latest modifications. Did you guys get the molding equipment necessary to form those conical necks? Margi 10-03-2008, 7:19 AM We do have the necessary equipment to make the neck cones! jcook54 10-03-2008, 7:56 AM It's been three days going strong for my OF 100. It looked great when it first fired up; it's starting to look better with the neck and cup starting to break in. I still can't believe how small the footprint is. The gang at MRC did a great job with this product and have been outstanding in their service! Derek_S 10-03-2008, 8:31 AM Yeah, they got it right on the small footprint. The design is very space conservative. When I saw them at MRC I was impressed with the overall quality. And this was before they had the conical neck reducers. The test skimmers were hauling butt in the test tanks. flyingarmy 10-03-2008, 8:41 AM Very impressive...looks like another excellent quality product from MRC! Mockery 10-03-2008, 9:33 AM I want one but there is no way that will fit my sump:sad: Roland Jacques 10-03-2008, 9:36 AM Man I sure woud like to get one of those skimmers. As soon as some dead beat pays me for a chiller, I will be able to get one of those nice Skimmers. Can't wait :yes: kelleyga36 10-03-2008, 11:53 AM How deep of water in the sump is recommended for these skimmers? jcook54 10-03-2008, 1:00 PM My OF 100 is in about 4" of water and it's working fine. I suppose it only needs to be high enough to cover the intake head without causing a vortex but don't quote me on this. I haven't seen any sort of manual for it and they didn't say anything specific about water level when I picked it up. Skriz 10-03-2008, 1:06 PM Man I sure woud like to get one of those skimmers. As soon as some dead beat pays me for a chiller, I will be able to get one of those nice Skimmers. Can't wait :yes: I'll get on that guy asap...what a bumb! How deep of water in the sump is recommended for these skimmers? The minimum should be about 4 inches. As long as the inlet is submerged, you should be fine. kelleyga36 10-03-2008, 1:06 PM Can you post a picture of it running? FutureInterest 10-03-2008, 1:12 PM They look sweet. What kind of numbers are you getting in terms of air flow on these? Big D 10-05-2008, 9:18 PM Agreed... they look very promising. Some good looking #'s as far as wattages go. :thumbs: Just wondering, the footprint on the 300 shows to be 9" x 7.75", yet it's an 8" diameter body. :confused2: Just looked at the 200 and it's showing a footprint of 7.25" x 5.5", but it's got a 6" diameter body?.. are the bodies a little smaller in diameter then what's listed? D jcook54 10-05-2008, 9:42 PM I have a couple of great pics of day one and today. There is quite a bit of difference the skimmate is thicker and darker. I know it may take longer to fully "break in" but even now it's beating the pants off my old skimmer. BTW How do you upload pictures? Aparently I have to load ActiveX by clicking on an elusive "Information Bar". I'll post some pics as soon as I figure out how to do so. Skriz 10-06-2008, 10:12 AM Good eye, David. Those are the old specs..forgot to update them! OF 100 - 7x7 OF 200 - 9 x 8.25 OF 300 - 12 x 10 Steve 10-06-2008, 10:19 AM Can they be recirc'd? |